The Washington Capitals Alex Ovechkin Dirty Player Punk Ass Bitch, must be a Republican

The Alex Ovechkin case is absurd. Ovechkin is a Dirty Player, not only was the hit illegal (i.e. against NHL rules) Ovechkin's hit on Brian Campbell was dirty. And the outcome was horrible, Campbell was seriously injured as a result, suffering a broken clavicle and a broken rib.

But, Fans of the Washington Capitals reacted with ridiculous Sport Umbrage. 72% of respondents in a Washington Post Poll believe Ovechkin shouldn't even have received an in-game penalty let alone a suspension for a hit which ended Campbell's season. That number alone would indicate the harshness of Capitals Fans but when their shameless complaints and blog comments are added on I have to wonder if every Capital fan is a Republican for their egregious inhumanity.

Capitals Fans whining included baseless speculations (the ice must have had a rut, Campbell must have toe-picked), lies about Ovechkin's hit (It was from the side, it was a push) replay's clearly showed Ovechkin hitting Campbell in between his numbers on his back, paranoid conspiracy theories (the suspension is to make Ovechkin lose the Scoring Trophy, Colin Campbell hates Russian players because he's Canadian) false equivalencies (Player X wasn't suspended for his hit therefore Ovechkin should not be suspended either). It was really a massive amount of bullshit when the video of the hit clearly showed Ovechkin spread his feet to gain leverage, then deliver a hit on Campbell squarely in the back after the puck was gone and while he was 10 feet from the boards.

Now, if Ovechkin had never done an illegal intentional dirty hit before perhaps a two-game suspension would have been sufficient, but as if often the case with piece of shit criminals or hockey goons, Ovechkin has a long history and recent suspensions for similar actions.

And worst of all Ovechkin, his head coach, Bruce Boudreau and the team's owner weren't upset about the intentional illegal act by Ovechkin which resulted in a serious injury to Campbell but because Ovechkin got suspended for his filthy SMERSH-style play. "I was disappointed with the NHL's decision yesterday," ~ Alexander Ovehkin. “I was so upset for him. I feel so bad for the guy,” ~ Bruce Boudreau. Capitals owner Ted Leonsis wrote on his blog Monday that he didn’t think a suspension was warranted. “I don’t think Alex should have received a game misconduct for that play,” he said. “I don’t think he should miss our next game either." Disgusting.

It's embarrassing to see people suspend their reasoning capabilities because of their Sports Team loyalty, It's more embarrassing to see them suspend their morality for that reason.

Watergate Jr: Breitbart is running scared

Andrew Breitbart is a quivering mass of frightened chicken hawk flesh right now. His young male ward, the Domestic Terrorist James O'Keefe, is about to bring him down into a criminal conspiracy.

Breitbart as a punk ass bitch conservative immediately went on the attack (Eric Holder! ACORN! DoJ Conspiracy! Media Conviction! Underwear!) in an attempt to enlist the aid of other immoral anti-human conservatives and to rouse his rabid actively ignorant rabble, when his plan to interfere with the communications system of a sitting US Senator and member of Homeland Security went awry.

However, when asked about the specific charges pending against the 4 Conservative Domestic Terrorists Breitbart states "I"m not here to get into the details..." Of course not! Because your young male ward and cowardly conservative accomplices are guilty and O'Keefe is going to bring you down.

As a cop I know criminals and Andrew Breitbart has Piece of Shit Criminal written all over his face. When a criminal case has no chance of touching a p.o.s. criminal they relax and don't even think about the case.

But, when a criminal is guilty as O'Keefe, Flanagan, Dai, Basel and Breitbart are in Watergate Jr, they shout and rave and throw up as many distractions and obfuscation as possible in order to divert attention from themselves and their guilt.

Maybe I should start calling the violently stupid conservative's who support these Criminals "O'Kweefers" to highlight their connection to such conservative strains of thought as Birtherism.

Updated:
As a shock to no one, Domestic Terrorist James O'Keefe is a Racist. O'Keefe attended and was involved in a White Supremacist Forum held on August 30, 2006 in Arlington, VA.

You see to hypocrite conservatives legal rules apply only to Henry Louis Gates, ACORN and the Black Panthers not to lilly white chicken hawks.

What the Future Holds if Republicans win

As an Police Officer the prime way I illicit a confession from scumbag piece of shit criminials is by Blaming the Victim. I let them believe they are totally in the Right and the victim is responsible for the p.o.s. criminals actions. It easily leads to them agreeing with me and therefore admitting their crimes.

Never-Missed-A-Meal puffy faced chicken hawk Conservative Thinker Jonah Goldberg lays the foundation for conservatives "Tough Love":

Even if blame lies everywhere except among the victims themselves...

Which, of course, to Goldberg it doesn't, as he goes on to blame the Haitians for dying in a terrible natural disaster. Conservatives as natural Punk Ass Bitches and Scum Bag Pieces of Shit agree with him and blame the Haitians.

Blaming the vicitm, you see, is a core principle of piece of shit criminals and conservatives.

You're sick? It's your fault.
You're poor? You're to blame.

Conservatives hate people, it's why they stand with the Republican Party. Because they know the Republican Party platform is to Steal Money and Kill People.

And right now the Republicans are feeling giddy over Senator-Elect Brown's victory. And Liberals are feeling we have foisted a progressive ideology onto Obama which he does not share. And that the Democratic Party doesn't stand for Liberals. As Harry Truman stated:

The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat...

Most Liberals are upset with Obama's perceived lack of vigor. Or as James Surowiecki writes: Ultimately, I think Obama’s real problem has been a familiar one, namely that, inadvertently or not, he overpromised and necessarily underdelivered. Americans want a true Liberal Party not the Corporate Conservatives masquerading as Democrats. However, there in lies a problem. By not voting for Democrats they empower the Republicans who are solely owned and operated by the Kleptocracy.

With the Democratic Party we very occasionally get a Dennis Kucinich a strong Progressive Liberal who genuinely endorses and advances progressive issues, if the Republicans regain control then Americans will continue to get force feed the cold shit sandwich of Conservatives values: Creationism, Pollution, Theft, Warfare, and Death.

Again from Harry Truman:

You can always count on the Republicans, in an election year, to remind the people of what the Republican Party really stands for. You can always count on them to make it perfectly clear before the campaign is over that the Republican Party is the party of big business, and that they would like to turn the country back to the big corporations and the big bankers in New York to run it as they see fit. ~ Address at the National Convention Banquet of the Americans for Democratic Action. May 17, 1952

Related:
Disaffected and it Feels So Good: True Cowardice [Jonah Goldberg's All I'm Saying Is Give War a Chance]
STAY A WHILE: Know Your Enemy
Translating David Brooks: Matt Taibbi [Taibblog]

Stop Snitchin'

"Say nothing, no matter what happens. You understand? You don't ever talk to the cops." Henry Rollins' Neo-Nazi implores his son before being shot to death in Sons of Anarchy.

Last year I was assigned to a report of youths stealing political signs from front yards. After walking the neighborhood, I discovered the signs stacked into a nearby backyard. I knocked on the door and informed the residents of the crime and the clear evidence in their backyard. The parents of the two high school aged brats who lived in the quite posh home told me their sons would make no statements and they would have their lawyer contact the police. Fortunately, for me the problem didn't become a big pissing match, because the community members merely wanted their signs back and (of course) couldn't be hassled to sign complaints against the two hoodlums.

That relatively minor incident highlighted two important things to me: 1) People no matter what their income don't want to help solve and deter crime and 2) Parents instill an obstructionist mind set into their children by hampering police officers rather than let their loved one face any consequence for their actions. Incidentally this is also why Police Officers don't cross the Thin Blue Line and rat out one another because they know the officer will receive no sympathy or clemency from the public. (Us and Them...)

However, as a recent Chicago Tribune article highlighted an unfortunate number of people still hold to the street's code of silence.

Teens say they won't talk to law enforcement for a variety of reasons. Sometimes they fear reprisal. They may know the person suspected of a crime, or they may have a criminal history of their own. Sometimes they're just mistrustful of police. "Being labeled a snitch carries a price," Julie Whitman, author of the study "Snitches Get Stitches said. "Not just of potential violence, but ostracism by neighbors and peers."

Despite Whitman's list of the commonly accepted factors why the public are tight-lipped it appears to me that the overarching reason the public don't inform more often, even after a horrible crime has been committed, is that Snitchin' is somehow wrong. The recent abduction and murder of 12 year old Jahmeshia Conner, prompted Chicago Mayer in perpetuity Richard Daley to state, "It drives home that silence is unacceptable. We're asking the community, the police are, but there's no response in the community on that child."

However, the clear problem is for me is the people who want you to never talk to the police are criminals. The drug pushers, thieves, burglars, rapists, spousal abusers and murderers. And while they may convince you that your interests align in a specific instance, p.o.s. criminals are the only ones who benefit when people don't tell the cops who did the drive-by shooting, who's pulling residential and car burglaries and who's pushing the fentanyl laced heroin...

Addendum:
It strikes me that the creation of large impersonal metropolitan cities and the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese are related to the stop snitchin' ideal as humans have the essentially tribal a priori mindset of our recent ancestors still hardwired into our limbic system.