Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Watergate Jr: Breitbart is running scared

Andrew Breitbart is a quivering mass of frightened chicken hawk flesh right now. His young male ward, the Domestic Terrorist James O'Keefe, is about to bring him down into a criminal conspiracy.

Breitbart as a punk ass bitch conservative immediately went on the attack (Eric Holder! ACORN! DoJ Conspiracy! Media Conviction! Underwear!) in an attempt to enlist the aid of other immoral anti-human conservatives and to rouse his rabid actively ignorant rabble, when his plan to interfere with the communications system of a sitting US Senator and member of Homeland Security went awry.

However, when asked about the specific charges pending against the 4 Conservative Domestic Terrorists Breitbart states "I"m not here to get into the details..." Of course not! Because your young male ward and cowardly conservative accomplices are guilty and O'Keefe is going to bring you down.

As a cop I know criminals and Andrew Breitbart has Piece of Shit Criminal written all over his face. When a criminal case has no chance of touching a p.o.s. criminal they relax and don't even think about the case.

But, when a criminal is guilty as O'Keefe, Flanagan, Dai, Basel and Breitbart are in Watergate Jr, they shout and rave and throw up as many distractions and obfuscation as possible in order to divert attention from themselves and their guilt.

Maybe I should start calling the violently stupid conservative's who support these Criminals "O'Kweefers" to highlight their connection to such conservative strains of thought as Birtherism.

As a shock to no one, Domestic Terrorist James O'Keefe is a Racist. O'Keefe attended and was involved in a White Supremacist Forum held on August 30, 2006 in Arlington, VA.

You see to hypocrite conservatives legal rules apply only to Henry Louis Gates, ACORN and the Black Panthers not to lilly white chicken hawks.


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

If everybody in the press did their job as aggressively as breitbart, the politicians would be running scared, like the piggies they are

TRUTH 101 said...

The sound of handcuffs being slapped on Breitbart would be music to my ears Gene. I don't know which is the bigger scumbag. Breitbart or Ericson of Redstate.

Green Eagle said...

I just want to say that I love the name, "Watergate Junior." It both captures the essence of their behavior, and its childishness.

Fat chance that they will ever be held responsible for their behavior, however. I fully expect this dick to emerge in a decade or two as a major Republican strategist. After all, he has the only qualification that counts- not one shred of morality or self respect.

Grung_e_Gene said...

Politicians bad actions do not absolve Breitbart and his 4 little domestic terrorists of their criminal actions.

Unless you think The Law is only to be applied to Henry Louis Gates and the Black Panthers and not to Andy Whitebart... err... Breitbart?

Jolly Roger said...

The Klanservatives have their yellow panties in a twist over this one. I am definitely enjoying reading their hysterical conspiracy theories (especially after they were claiming that their golden boy "proved" that ACORN is worse than La Cosa Nostra.)

Anonymous said...

No Grunge, if he broke the law then he must be punished. It still doesn't take away from the brilliant job he did exposing acorn for the sleazy operation it is.

And breitbart is doing fine work. I for one wish the press would stop taking sides and telling us what to think, and instead just investigate and report the damned news.

If a conservative is crooked I want him busted just as badly as a crooked lib.

Grung_e_Gene said...

breitbart doesn't take sides?

Anonymous said...

Of course breitbart takes sides. Who doesn't? Show me where he's lying.

Anyway, my beef with the acorn nuts is a libertarian one. Government shouldn't be handing our tax dollars to any organization, and that includes the the faith based initiatives.

If people want to community organize they can do it on their own dime or get funding from the guilty liberal corporatists, of which there are plenty.

Green Eagle said...

Silverfiddle, when you say "Government shouldn't be handing our tax dollars to any organization," I presume you are including Halliburton, Blackwater, and for that matter Lockheed and Boeing.

Or is privatization only a good thing when it goes to people on your side of the fence?

I wouldn't want to think you are just another garden variety right wing hypocrite.

Grung_e_Gene said...


Show me where he's lying.

First off, nice diversion from the key point which is Breitbart's criminal conspiracy.

But, I want a clear answer for this. You believe Breitbart's allegations that the Eric Holder and the Department of Justice have unfairly targeted James O'Keefe, denied him his constitutional rights and more damning are engaged in a conspiracy?

And more clearly that Barack Obama is on the side of the Terrorists?

Grung_e_Gene said...

Oh and Silverfiddle, Breitbart is a liar. He is peddling a bullshit scenrio that O'Keefe was denied an attorney under the Terrorist loving Obama Administration.

First off this is a Federal crime that O'Keefe is being charged with and I deal with Illinois law so I'm not up to dat eon what the Federal statutes state for detention but here's Illinois Law:

Persons who are arrested shall have the right to communicate with an attorney of their choice and a member of their family by making a reasonable number of telephone calls or in any other reasonable manner. Such communication shall be permitted within a reasonable time after arrival at the first place of custody.

Define reasonable and I'll define it a different way and have a State's Attorney to back me up.

But, since Breitbart is a liar and a hypocrite and stupid he doesn't understand or know the law.

But, what he does understand is how to frame an argument to enflame the racist bigotry of his birtherite vegetative rabble.

He is another important things to consider-
From Illinois v. Perkins (SC Ruling):

It is Miranda's premise that the danger of coercion results from the interaction of custody and official interrogation, whereby the suspect may feel compelled to speak by the fear of reprisal for remaining silent or in the hope of more lenient treatment should he confess.

Processing a suspect and holding them while other facts are gained from witnesses or other people not in custody does not deny O'Keefe's rights.

But, I doubt you have read this far or care too because you obviously believe O'Keefe is innocent merely because he is a Conservative.